Determining Your Binder Work Time


A common nobake binder work time testing procedure may not be as accurate as you think.

Greg Sturtz and Jean Szabo, ASK Chemicals, Dublin, Ohio, U.S.

If you work in the nobake molding department of your metalcasting facility, it is likely you are using the B scale mold hardness gauge method to determine the work time of your binder. The test, which was originally designed to measure green sand hardness and now is used for nobake molds, is one of several common tests used across the metalcasting industry to measure work time offered by the AFS Mold and Core Test Handbook. However, few of the tests are scientific ways of measuring work time.

ASK Chemicals produced dog bone core specimens and tested them over intervals to determine how quickly tensile strength deteriorated.

In nobake molding, sand is mixed with the binders and then packed into a pattern. This step must be finished quickly before the binders start to react, resulting in stiff sand, poor mold strength and eventually, flawed castings. Determining how long the molder has to pack the pattern before the sand mix loses its optimal molding properties is necessary to keep molds or cores from breaking or producing defective castings.

Work Time Defects

The consequences of exceeding the work time of your binders are costly. Compacting the sand too long after curing begins could result in:

• Reduced strength.

• Mold breakage during handling.

• Mold cracking or core failure at casting.

• Poor mold and core density.

• Penetration defects and poor surface finish in the casting.

Unfortunately, many mold and casting problems can be attributed to other issues in the casting process. Telltale signs that your facility is compacting its molds too late after curing include weak molds and the penetration defect, as well as stiff sand during compaction. A good molder will notice when the sand is starting to stiffen up, indicating it is curing too fast and the catalyst should be reduced.

Measuring Work Time

In the sand lab at ASK Chemicals, Dublin, Ohio, researchers developed an interval testing method to determine work time. After the sand was mixed with the binder, laboratory core specimens were produced at 3-minute intervals until the cores were too weak to hold. Each specimen was tested for tensile strength and compared (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Three core specimens produced with the major binders used in the U.S. were tested for tensile strength in the lab. In the test, a strip time of 20 minutes was used.

The experiment was performed with the three most common binders used in the North American metalcasting industry—1% furan nobake, 1% phenolic urethane nobake and 1.25% ester-cured phenolic. These common nobake systems were run with catalyst or coreactants to provide the same 20-minute strip time for each binder chemistry.  Tensile strengths of the specimens at each interval were recorded and the percentage of tensile loss calculated. It was determined that a binder had exceeded its work time when it experienced more than 25% tensile loss.  In the case of the experiment, furan nobake achieved 25% tensile loss in 3 minutes, resulting in a 3-minute work time. Phenolic urethane and ester-cured nobake had longer work times of approximately 9 minutes (Fig. 2).

The results were compared with the results of a B scale hardness gauge test run to determine the work time. The commonly used readings of 45 or 60 for the B scale hardness gauge were used to determine work time.

Fig. 2. Work times determined with the interval test are significantly less than that of correlating work times determined with the B scale mold hardness gauge.

The interval and gauge tests gave conflicting results. For instance, the gauge test indicated the amount of time before the tensile strength of the furan nobake binder would be too low was 14 minutes. However, the interval test indicated the sand mix produced with the same chemistry had just 3-6 minutes before tensile strength would be too low for proper core or moldmaking.

Disparity of work times between the two tests occurred for the other binders, as well. According to the experiment results, metalcasting facilities depending on nonscientific methods to determine work time, including the B scale hardness gauge, in particular, run the danger of attempting to produce molds and cores past their window for optimal tensile strength.  Figure 3 shows a comparison of the percentage tensile loss in the interval test versus the B scale mold hardness gauge measurement for the furan nobake. This graph suggests that a much lower B scale gauge reading of 20-25 corresponds to a 25% loss in tensile strength.